George Woodhead

Call date: 2009
Telephone number: 020 7400 9600

George Woodhead

Call date: 2009
Telephone number: 020 7400 9600

Practice areas

Business Property & private client

A busy and experienced junior, George specialises in property and contested probate cases.

George brings clear advice, strategy and energy to each case. Whilst most of George’s work is on paper or in conference, he appears in court every week, either in the County Court, FTT or High Court, where he recently enjoyed trial success against two leading silks.

The vast majority of George’s practice is repeat work from solicitors who value George’s hard-working, reliable and user-friendly attitude to the modern Bar.


George is regularly instructed by commercial clients, often where there is a property or trust element to the issue in question.

George has particular and recent experience in the following areas:

Business: share purchase agreements; freezing injunctions; partnership disputes; s. 994 petitions and director disputes; sale of goods and services; building and construction disputes; commercial leases and renewals; claims arising out of the sale of land; contractual interpretation and rectification; insurance disputes; and general contractual litigation.

Recent trials/hearings:

Martin v (1) Posener (2) Posener [2017] EWHC 2320 (QB): trial (acting as junior) concerning affirmation, contractual terms, repudiation, foreign law.

Barchester Healthcare Limited v Cowdery (2017) (Maidstone County Court): summary judgment application concerning contractual interpretation.

Other reported decisions:

Eastenders Cash & Carry plc and another company v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] All ER (D) 52 (Nov): concerning the power of detention contained in the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979, s. 139(1).

Property & private client

The bulk of George’s practice falls in this practice group. George has particular expertise in the following:

Real Property: trusts of land and family-owned property/cohabitation disputes; proprietary estoppel; nuisance; boundary disputes; easements and rights of way; claims arising out of the sale of land; property-related professional negligence; and mortgages (including fraud and undue influence).

George is adept in cases requiring urgent action, where injunctions, declarations and/or specific performance are sought.

Landlord & Tenant: (residential and commercial): commercial lease renewals; possession and forfeiture; dilapidations; lease interpretation and analysis; and lease extensions.

Contested Probate: Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 claims; trusts of land applications and cohabitation disputes; trustees’ duties and powers; the removal and appointment of trustees; and challenges to the validity of wills and testamentary capacity.

George is increasingly involved in cases in which capacity is an issue and handles such matters with care, sensitivity and experience.

Recent trials/hearings

Hill v (1) Hill & (2) Hill (2017) (Bournemouth & Poole County Court): Part 8 final hearing concerning declarations of trust, the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996, orders for sale.

Ejikeme v Ikenna (2017) (Willesden County Court): trial concerning easements and interferences, boundaries, injunctions/damages in lieu.

Daniels (as executor) & anor. v Num & ors (2017) (Wandsworth County Court): trial concerning order for sale, damages for trespass, damages for delay in administration of estate, capacity.

Re. Kasperaitis (2017) (Northampton County Court): disposal hearing concenring Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 claim, capacity, historical abuse.

Irwin & ors v McNamara (2017) (Luton County Court): trial concerning rights of way and interferences, injunctions/damages in lieu.

Mintgreen Properties Limited v (1) Lakha (2) Honeybear House Limited (2017) (Edmonton County Court): interim injunction; easements and interference.

Vijay v (1) Sharma (2) Sharma (2017) (Central London County Court, HHJ Parfitt): interim injunction; building and construction; nuisance; party walls

(1) Fox (2) Fox v Madrigal Investment Limited (2017) (Brighton County Court, HHJ Simpkiss): trial concerning easements and interferences, proprietary estoppel, land valuation, injunctions/damages in lieu.

Cavanagh v (1) Witley Parish Council (2) David Shepherd (t/a Shepherd Tree Surgeons & Forestry Contractors) [2017] EWHC 278 (QB): trial concerning a negligence/private nuisance claim concerning a falling lime tree, local authorities’ powers and duties.

N O’Sullivan v Conteh (2016) (Central London County Court, HHJ Luba Q.C.): trial concerning misappropriation of company monies and the principle of offsetting against significant rental arrears.

Murphy v Parma (2016) (Central London County Court, HHJ Luba Q.C.): successful appeal concerning CPR 55.8, evidence.

Collins v Bennetta (2016) (Central London County Court, HHJ Bailey): successful appeal concerning possession, case management, evidence, procedural irregularity.

Other reported decisions:

Hackney LBC v Smith & Ors (2012): the appeal, before Mr Justice Vos, concerned adverse possession and the Adjudicator to Her Majesty’s Land Registry (Practice and Procedure) Rules 2003, r. 42.


George began practice at the Bar with three major scholarships from Lincoln’s Inn. He is a member of the Property Bar Association, Chancery Bar Association and the Association of Contested Trusts and Probate Specialists. George is the Editor of Chambers’ Property newsletter and ‘Proprietary Estoppel’ on Westlaw’s Insight.

Regulatory information

Vat number: 156 6922 81

Bar Standards Board